Purpose of avoiding re-investigation? Hwang Ui-jo ‘controversy over illegal video filming’ Hwang Ui-jo goes to without direct flight, not returning to Korea…The truth battle is ING

Hwang Ui-jo (31, Norwich City) gave up a charter flight to return to Korea via charter flight from China and headed for Britain, which has no “direct port” route. It is feared that it may be aimed at avoiding investigations rather than revealing the truth.

The South Korean national soccer team, led by head coach Jürgen Klinsmann, faced China in the second Group C match of the 2026 FIFA Asian qualifying round at 9 p.m. on the 21st at the Universiade Sports Center in Shenzhen, China, and won 3-0. 슬롯머신

After the game, some players left China immediately. Starting with “Captain” Son Heung-min (Tottenham), Kim Min-jae (Bayern Munich), Lee Jae-sung (Mainz), Hwang Hee-chan (Wolverhampton), Lee Kang-in (PSG), Oh Hyun-gyu (Celtic), Jung Woo-young (Freiburg), and Kim Seung-gyu (Al-Shabab) are the main characters.
First of all, the above-mentioned players travel to Korea first via chartered plane. And after arriving in Korea, Kim Min-jae and Lee Kang-in head back to Europe. It’s an inevitable flight because of the game schedule. The players rented a chartered flight with permission from the Korea Football Association and Jürgen Klinsmann’s coach and coaching staff.

Players pay and use it themselves. An official from the Korea Football Association said, “Players playing abroad paid for their own charter flights. He wanted to move to Korea as soon as possible because it would be difficult to return to Korea by March next year after the call-up of the A match. He explained, “I moved quickly to carry out my personal schedule.”

Meanwhile, Cho Kyu-sung (Mit Whelan) will not return to Korea but will return to the team immediately because he can move from Shenzhen to Denmark. The problem is Hwang Ui-jo. According to a soccer official, he was transferred to a suspect status on the 18th for illegally filming sex subjects and had to return to the national team after being investigated.

A, who introduced himself as Hwang Ui-jo’s ex-lover in June, said, “I’m a woman who met Hwang Ui-jo. He gaslighted numerous women by avoiding establishing relationships because they would go to bed if they acted as if they were in a relationship with their partner and had to go abroad again. I don’t know how many victims there will be.”

It even posted videos and photos of Hwang Ui-jo and the victim. Mr. A said, “We are posting several photos and videos of evidence to prove that it is not spreading false facts. This is only a fraction, and women are kept from being seen as much as possible. I hope there will be no more victims,” he added.

However, it caused controversy because it was a clear distribution that caused secondary damage to the woman. Hwang Ui-jo’s side immediately refuted the claim. His management company, UJ Sports, said it was a “groundless rumor.” He then sued A right away.

Hwang Ui-jo claimed that the video posted on social media was leaked through a mobile phone he lost when he was playing for Olympiacos in Greece last year. He also stressed that it was not illegal filming, that all the revelations were false, and that he had already suffered several threats.
He even made a handwritten statement. Hwang Ui-jo said, “A false post was uploaded and a privacy video was circulated by someone who calls himself my girlfriend. I have never done anything illegal in relation to my personal life as many people are concerned.”

About five months later, Hwang Ui-jo was converted to a suspect and the incident came back to the surface. The police called him to investigate on the 18th, and are reportedly continuing their investigation into allegations of illegal filming, including seizure and search of mobile phones and conducting digital forensics.

On the 22nd, the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency’s cybercrime investigation team arrested a woman A on charges of spreading and threatening Hwang Ui-jo’s private life video, who was Hwang Ui-jo’s brother-in-law and was his family and closest aide. It turned out that he was actually Hwang Ui-jo’s manager, accompanying Hwang Ui-jo’s brother on business trips abroad.
Currently, the police are investigating how and why A distributed the personal video. On the 21st, the victim, who appeared in the video, said, “I’ve had a relationship, but I haven’t agreed to film it. I kept asking for deletion. The shooting was also filmed, but if they had broken up and deleted it before dissemination, the victim would not have come out,” he said, officially suing A and Hwang Ui-jo.

Hwang Ui-jo’s side countered, “The video shows a woman who dated Hwang Ui-jo in the past, but what is clear is the agreed-upon video between the lovers at the time.” He denied the illegal filming itself.

Literally, the mud-truth battle is bound to continue. In the end, it is essential that Hwang Ui-jo undergoes additional investigation in Korea in order to resolve the case. As Hwang Ui-jo, who even filed a petition for impunity against A, suspicions were bound to grow further at this rate.
However, he blatantly refused to go to South Korea to avoid a reinvestigation. Hwang Ui-jo, who joined the national team after being investigated once, was investigated again as a defendant when he returned to Korea in the propaganda letter. Under these circumstances, Hwang Ui-jo, who did not take a charter flight to Korea, where most of the players were on board, eventually chose to go to England immediately.

Unlike Jo Gyu-seong, which had a direct flight, Hwang Ui-jo reportedly traveled to Guangzhou once and then headed to the UK by plane. The controversy over Hwang Ui-jo is expected to grow further as he avoided and avoided re-investigation ahead of various suspicions, including a battle for truth against the victim and a petition for impunity against A.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *